Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Advanced Academic Programs (AAP)
Reply to "U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts on Friday called for a response from a Virginia school"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Stuyvesant is 45% low-income. 53% of NYC public school kids are low-income. [/quote] I was responding to the moron who kept saying poor students can't gain admission. You keep changing the subject and I will keep reminding.[/quote] Before last year, they couldn't be admitted to TJ. You apparently need to be reminded of that. [/quote] I am not sure there has been any verification of family income at TJ as being below $47k to determine percentage of low income students. [/quote] They have farms data for every year. [/quote] As has been explained a few times on this discussion, FARMS data is totally corrupted by the way the question was posed by FCPS - even millionaire households could have legally opted-in to FARMS. Any determination of low-income kids doing better under the new process is absolute fiction. [/quote] Ok. We do know that before covid and before the change there were practically no low-income students at TJ. 0.6% admitted for class of 2024. So even getting a handful more kids from the unrepresented MSs or English-learners would have doubled the previous #s. Yes, amoral parents may have selected “free lunch” so we don’t know the exact #, but it surely is greater than 0.6%. [/quote] What is amoral is you making a conclusive statement based on unsubstantiated data. The FARMS data is not reliable. People called in to FCPS to ask whether anyone could answer yes to that question and they were told that they could say yes given how it was worded. If the question asked was “were you eligible for free and reduced price meals last year?”. And given Covid, everyone was eligible, I would answer “yes, I was”. I would even argue that if I said no, I was misrepresenting under signature. It was a massive $crew-up on the part of FCPS. And now to claim that we have more FARMS kids with the new process is totally disingenuous. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics