Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Jobs and Careers
Reply to "Law firms now demoting partners . "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]De-equitization of partners isn't a new trend, but rather has been going on for years behind the scenes. Older partners are slowly de-equitized in order to free up that equity for younger folks who want to join the ranks. Firms don't necessarily want to grow their outstanding equity. Rather, they would prefer to keep the same number of equity partners so that everyone is generally happy. Likewise, de-equitization isn't a sudden event - it is often preceded by years of declining billables and business generation. In most cases, the older partners know it's going to happen, but that doesn't necessarily make it any easier from a psychological standpoint.[/quote] How does it happen in reality? Do they take the old guy to lunch and then tell him they're de-equitizing him? Are they allowed to do it at will? [/quote] This depends on the particular firm's partnership agreement, but generally it would require a vote of all the partners or perhaps just a vote of a management committee. In more genteel firms, this would be handled "softly" by encouraging a partner to agree to de-equitize. But, the trend is towards just a committee vote. But, agreed with the previous poster that this happens slowly at most firms. It usually follows years of underperformance or low profitability.[/quote] For older partners, it often happens due to firms' mandatory retirement policies. [/quote] Yes, that's true. I assumed when we were discussing the "trend" of firms de-equitizing partners, we weren't really talking about mandatory retirement ages, but we were talking about pushing out underperforming partners. But, you're right, many partnership agreements contain mandatory retirement policies.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics