Reply to About time the New York Times exposed the sham marriage [GREAT piece today]

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "About time the New York Times exposed the sham marriage [GREAT piece today]"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I'm lol'ing at the hundreds of hypocrite lefties in the nytimes.com comment section saying "This is old news! This is 20 years old! Any woman would do the same to protect their family!"[/quote]

The majority of women would have dumped him.[/quote]

I agree - especially women who shared similar credentials.

Can you imagine some of our "best" DCUM female attorneys making excuses for their high-profile husbands?

wouldn't happen unless they were completely insecure or so into appearances that they'd be willing to share their husband's penis with the world

I do wonder about the women who support Hillary with these excuses that she "did it for the family" or that it was "their personal business."  makes me think they married a Bill, too[/quote]

Are you 30?  I know many women at this point in my career that this has happened to.  I learned that I never know how I am going to react if it happened to me.  One can never understand another person's marriage.  To pass judgment is immature.[/quote]

I'm 50, hon, and all of my friends in bad marriages got the fuck out.  They didn't stick around.  One, in fact, is struggling right now with three kids squeezed into a small townhouse.  better than being with the asshole

So there are plenty of women - rich, poor, in the middle - who have more integrity than Hillary.

Immature 50 yo signing off!

[/quote]

So you've been around long enough to know that everyone's situation is different and women make painful decisions in the best interest of their family all the time. So now women who don't leave their cheating husbands lack integrity?  Don't be so judgemental, HON.[/quote]

I'll be judgmental in these cases - in cases where women have the means and stability to get the fuck out - and those who don't who are smart enough to rely on friends to help them out.  We rallied around a friend who left her abusive husband.  We watched her children, helped her move, helped her find a place in the same school cluster, fed her meals, scheduled play dates with the kids.

You're telling me that Hillary CHOSE to stay with Bill b/c it was in the best interest of their family?  that having a husband screwing around on you MULTIPLE times is a good for your daughter?

Yes, I'm judgmental in this case.

She has a law degree.  She practiced law.  She supported healthcare reform before Obama hit the presidential seat.  She was Secretary of State.  Need I go on?  YET . . . YET she stayed with a man who only humiliated her again and again.

And we know why. She simply has no ethical bone in her body.

But that's OK b/c she's smarter than Trump and lies less than he does.

You go, Women's Advocate Poster!  Whether you have a penis or vagina, you should be held up to the same standards.  I'm not cutting any woman slack.  [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics