Reply to July 14 Rasmussen - Trump 44% Clinton 37%

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "July 14 Rasmussen - Trump 44% Clinton 37%"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]
I never said the GOP candidate was perfect, far from it, so no need for the snarky ending. Your nasty crap (i.e., my demigod Reagan, etc.) shows me you are just another rude liberal who can't have a respectful conversation with anyone who disagrees with you. Liberals....tolerant with everyone, as long as you agree with them.

I've wasted enough time.[/quote]

I don't think you're using this word "tolerant" correctly.

Where did that talking point come from, exactly? You all use it in exactly the same way, usually when you have been soundly proven wrong.[/quote]

1) You all use it exactly the same way: That's probably because liberals pride themselves on their open, welcoming attitude of diversity, calling themselves tolerant - and then (some) treat people who have different opinions with utter disrespect (to put it mildly). So they welcome diversity, as long as you agree with them.

2) Soundly proven wrong: Hah! That's almost funny. That superior attitude of "soundly proven wrong" once again reveals a liberal bias and an inability to recognize that decent people can have different opinions. We are not necessarily wrong....it's just that you think so.

Finally, I do not continue debates with people once they demonstrate contempt and disdain for those with differing views. if people want to debate someone, they should do so respectfully. I really can't imagine anyone with healthy self-esteem continuing to engage in a debate with a stranger on the Internet who is nasty to them.

I will add that I have had some respectful debates with liberals, right on this site, and I continue with them to the conclusion. But the nasty ones, nope....why would I want to? I don't enjoy rude exchanges.[/quote]

You weren't treated with utter disrespect. You were disagreed with. You're the one defaulting to the dismissive "humph, typically liberal - tolerant until someone disagrees" talking point. And it is a talking point because you all use it the same way.

And the pp smashed your argument. That's not smug; they had better answers.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics