Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Relationship Discussion (non-explicit)
Reply to "Men: Would you date a woman who did not have a "real job"?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I think it's upsetting for women who have worked so hard academically and sacrificed for their careers to learn that most men would be just as happy if you had been a yoga instructor or an ES teacher. But it's true. Most men want smart (not genius smart, just up on current events smart) pretty, sweet, affectionate, care-takers for wives. The details are not important. A man who would want a big-law partner for a wife is very rare. The PP who said that UMC men end up with these women b/c the women pursue these men was spot on. FWIW, I am UMC, went to an Ivy and married an Ivy grad (both undergrad and law school) and I can tell you he would not give two hoots if I became a dog-walker tomorrow. He simply wants me to be happy, b/c when I'm happy his life is wonderful. That's out men. And no it's not sad. It's sweet and supportive. Most women would freak out if their high-earning husbands stepped off that track.[/quote] You are a living example of what you're trying to disprove, and it's sort of funny how you don't see it. OK, your husband may not mind if you became a dogwalker tomorrow. But: you are UMC. You went to an Ivy. As did your husband. This shared experience ensured that you and your husband have intellectual and educational parity, and that your family probably had similar expectations toward your education. You two speak and think on the same intellectual plane. Ergo, you two are a living example of assortative mating. The fact that you may not have a job currently or in future is irrelevant. You and your husband are of the same class. Your husband and an LC waitress would not have been. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics