Reply to Filibuster for Gun Safety

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Filibuster for Gun Safety"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote] I just don't understand this at all! It seriously makes me want to cry that we can't even get something this small and logical passed[/quote]

Because if this "small and logical" bill is passed, it is only another "small and logical" step to ban another weapon type say any rifle over 30 caliber, then the number of bullets you can have and then eventually all weapons to disarm the law-abiding population.

[b]Taking away the rights of the citizenry rarely starts with one big sweep of legislation, it is small steps during a "crisis" where these freedoms and rights are chipped away[/b].

We have the right to bear arms, any arms, and [b]as many and of whatever type we want[/b].  Period. End of discussion.   No one, no matter how pompous and big mouthed does not get to filibuster away our constitutional rights. [/quote]

You mean regulating the rights of citizenry in ways that are sensible and will PROTECT the citizenry . . . because you know as well as I do that no one is taking away your rights. Asking to show that you're a law abiding, sane person before having guns is NOT asking a lot. And the only ones being targeted for "banning", and rightfully so, are the military style assault rifle which have no place in civil society. If you don't see that, there is not a shred of sense in you.

And as to the second bold, that just shows you don't understand constitutional law.  Becuase that is NOT what it means. Even constitutional rights like free speech and assembly and religion can be and are regulated.  Go yell "Fire" in a crowded movie theater and see what happens . . . . [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics