Reply to Wall Street Journal article says Clinton might not be the nominee

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Wall Street Journal article says Clinton might not be the nominee"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]

Sorry if I hurt your feelings. I just consider people who are unnecessarily rude and confrontational on the internet to be trolls even if they are expressing a valid point. If the shoe fits...

I have interest in making a case for Sanders as a candidate but I do not have any reason to believe he has a chance of winning the nomination. I do find it interesting that some people think he might have a chance if he wins CA. I had assumed he had no chance at all. So I posted this thread to see what people think of it. Mostly all I have gotten is a lot of Clinton supporters being rude and taking issue with the word "article." Don't know what that's about.[/quote][/quote]

It's about you and other Sanders supporters starting new threads every day pretending that you are posting something new when it the same bullshit you have been posting for the past month about the fantasy of superdelegates switching sides to your losing candidate. 
[/quote]

I have not posted a thread in months. I am sure it is annoying to you that there are Sanders supporters who want to see a glimmer of hope but there is no reason to assume I have posted other threads. [b]I find it interesting that he might still have a chance. [/b][/quote]

The only chance he has is if there is an indictment or some other catastrophic event.  Winning California won't matter, and having Bernie supporters use winning California as a reason he might still have a chance is offensive to Clinton supporters because it's suggesting disregarding the popular vote and pledged delegate count.  Bernie supporters appear to be very willing to disregard how the majority of voters casted their votes.  One of many reasons why super delegates won't overturn the votes of the majority is that it would be a sure way to lose the general election.  While there might be some Bernie supporters who feel the nomination is being stolen from Bernie, if the super delegates overturned the popular vote, Hillary supporters will KNOW the nomination is being stolen, and a much larger segment of democrats will be feel disenfranchised by the party.  That is a guaranteed loss in the general election.  [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics