Reply to LAMB Enrollment Increase

Forum Index » DC Public and Public Charter Schools

Reply to "LAMB Enrollment Increase"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]You guys who want a "one size fits all policy" are stating so because your child did not get into your desired program through the lottery. I understand the frustration and the pain, but the solution is not to have charters with different mission statements (and the obligation to provide a high quality education to its attendees) accept children who would be under-served. Not to mention the children who would be disrupted by an inappropriate placement simply because "one size (or rules) fits all". Let's admit if there were enough quality seats to go around, we wouldn't be having this conversation. This is more a conversation about the scarcity of resources and conflating that with language immersions and their "elite" nature in not taking students at all grades. Fix neighborhood schools please.[/quote]

I'd be OK with providing more resources to neighborhood schools than schools with special exclusivity rules, but that conversation would never go anywhere with Charter boosters.[/quote]

That already happens in DC. See Focus lawsuit.[/quote]This. Charters are given less monies per pupil than DCPS. Please reference the lawsuit.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics