Reply to Guess the next scotus justice.

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Guess the next scotus justice."

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I'm sorry, but Jane Kelly doesn't get a pass for being a longtime federal public defender. Senator Grassley's payback only goes to the appellate slot, not the SUPREME COURT!!!

Although I would LOVE to see the Senate destroy Kelly and those "Federal Defender" prima donnas by extension.[/quote]

You have a grudge against federal defenders?   You're loony.  Any other constitutionally required positions you vilify?  I'm a prosecutor, but a grudge against federal defenders is batshit. [/quote]

Dollars for Defenders, at least at the Federal level, are dollars taken away from the rest of the courts. They soak up money directly that could go to paying clerks (for one example). Plus, when the Defenders drag out cases with unnecessary and frivolous motions and investigations, they waste prosecutor and court timen working through these things.

Are you really a prosecutor? I would think prosecutors would want to tamp down runaway defenders. I would think the victims would want that too.[/quote]
Yes I really am a federal prosecutor.  Of all the things one could claim is wrong with the federal judicial system, the federal defenders are not one of them.  You're wacky.  [/quote]

Duke doesn't help UNC-Greensboro recruit basketball players. So why on Earth would you want to help these people collect resources and talent that can beat you?[/quote]

Duke and UNC Greensboro are not on the same team. Prosecutors and defenders qlk uphold the same constitution. No one benefits when the constitutional right to a fair trial is threatened

BTW Greensboro isn't even in the acc. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics