Reply to What is going on at Sidwell is NOT just a “sex scandal”

Forum Index » Private & Independent Schools

Reply to "What is going on at Sidwell is NOT just a “sex scandal” "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=jsteele][quote=Anonymous][quote=jsteele][quote=Anonymous][quote=jsteele][quote=Anonymous]I'm sorry.  The site administrator just posted this link to a story that happened 2-3 years ago?  Save us the time and trouble of reading the attachment, what is the intent of your post?[/quote]

I'm not a lawyer so I don't feel confident trying to explain the document which reports an important ruling in the case. My very layman understanding which may be 180 degrees from reality is that a lower court's summary judgement was upheld on appeal in all but two cases. As a result, the former school psychologist's case against the aggrieved father can now proceed.
[/quote]

Since when is it your place to post this? Rumors that you're in with people involved in the case seem to be true?[/quote]

What a strange reaction. I own this website. Since when is it your place to question what I can do on it?

I am really surprised at the response to my post, but just to be clear, this topic has been the subject of many very long threads over the course of a few years. DCUM was mentioned in the court filings and posts on the site were part of the litigation. I assumed that there would be interest in the latest development. If you aren't interested, hopefully you can find another thread that is more to your liking. 
[/quote]

Do you often provide random updates on old cases that have nothing to do with you personally? Just seems out of character. Especially because there are individuals - including children - easily identifiable. You tend to delete threads that go down that road (the recent one attacking a female housewife/blogger, for example). Unless of course there's something else going on...[/quote]

Yes, I often provide updates (the randomness of which is debatable) to issues that have been subject to significant discussion on DCUM. Are you seriously not aware of the discussion of this case that has occurred here? There have probably been a half dozen threads that stretched to the teens in pages. One such thread was on my list of most popular one year. And, again, DCUM was actually brought up in the litigation as some of the drama occurred here.

[/quote]

I have not actively followed the case on here. That said, I do know there are actively identifiable children involved. Those children are innocent preteens and any publicity surrounding this case could hurt them. So why revive the situation? And why not flag this thread as you have others that identify innocent (or even not innocent) people?[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics