Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Kids With Special Needs and Disabilities
Reply to "CNN report -- Autism: Could high U.S. rate be due to over-diagnosis? "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous] [b]Again, OP, so what? [/b]Your proving my point that early intervention works and what may look like autism when children are young is made clearer through time and intervention. The 1 in 68 "estimate" from the CDC is based on a s[b]urveillance survey[/b], "Researchers reviewed records from [b]community sources that educate, diagnose, treat and/or provide services to children with developmental disabilities[/b]. [i]The criteria used to diagnose ASDs and the methods used to collect data have not changed.[/i].." These were NOT medical diagnoses. The number is based on children receiving services and under what category. I pity your SN child b/c your obsession is getting you no where. You obviously don't understand the initial CDC study on how they came up with the estimate. Please ask your pediatrician, ST or other health professional that your child sees to explain it to you.[/quote] So what? I think this is pretty important for numerous reasons: 1. it shows that perhaps the autism rate is over blown. There are so many people that are convinced that autism rates have sky rocketed in the past 20 yrs due to things like vaccines. If it can be proven that the autism rate is not as high as people have thought, then perhaps there wouldn't be such a hysteria over vaccines causing autism, and more parents would vaccinate their kids 2. it shows that the medical and insurance industry and schools needs to do a better job at understanding and addressing varying SN 3. it shows that, in some small cases, kids are slower to mature and develop, and they don't really have any SN other than being a late bloomer. I think years ago, more people were accepting of this fact than they are today. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics