Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Heads should roll on this horrendous issue"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=jsteele][quote=Anonymous][quote=jsteele][quote=Anonymous] Because the men on the ground knew they had the power to stop it without fear of prosecution. And many did. [b]Obama put in new rules of engagement[/b] and apparently punishes for 'cultural insensitivity'. [/quote] Can you point to a source supporting this allegation? I know, useless to ask. I'll be told to do my own research. [/quote] There are many - I'll provide one that shows how the rules of engagement have changed and put our soldiers in danger and restricted their ability to fight: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/dec/5/increase-in-battlefield-deaths-linked-to-new-rules/?page=all Regarding the sex issue, you can see the dodge here: http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/white-house-dodges-on-child-rape-in-afghanistan/article/2572538 [i]"We continue to urge the Afghan and civil society to protect and support victims and their families, while also strongly encouraging justice and accountability under Afghan law for offenders," Earnest said.[/i] The difference is, when it's happening on OUR bases using OUR taxpayer dollars to pay the rapists, we should be acting.[/quote] As usual, your "sources" do not support your claim. Can you quote the specific text from either article that says that Obama changed the ROE in such a way as to make punishment for reporting child sex abuse more likely? [/quote] Isn't the best proof the [b]prosecution of the green beret[/b]? Thats under Obama and he's the commander in chief...[/quote] He was prosecuted by being given one bad mark on his record, which then eventually led to him being discharged years later in the drawdown. Calling a bad mark on your record "prosecution" is pretty imprecise. http://www.armytimes.com/story/military/careers/army/enlisted/2015/08/21/green-beret-striking-corrupt-afghan-got-me-kicked-out/32080843/[/quote] Yes argue semantics. The fact that this is happening is disgusting.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics