Reply to IB

Forum Index » Advanced Academic Programs (AAP)

Reply to "IB"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]The only thing TJ is third on is a national ranking of high schools where RM and Blair are ranked 193rd and 500th, respectively.[/quote]

TJ kids are beaten by magnet kids from ranked 193rd and 500th schools? How embarrassing.  :) [/quote]

TJ has a higher percentage of kids as nmsf as well. TJ has about 36 % (163/450), Blair science magnet has about 33 %, RM IB has about 35%. [/quote]

New low even for DCUM standard. So now you are desperate enough to tell a lie? How cow man![/quote]

DP here.  You should not be complaining about lies, when you consistently misrepresented the size of TJ's current senior class at 500. PP is closer to the mark, as there were 450–460 juniors at TJ last year.  So the correct percentage at TJ is around 36%, not the lower 31% you keep repeating.

I do not know the exact sizes of the smaller programs at RM and Blair, but given your obvious inattention to detail and inability to confirm whether all the MMSF at RM and Blair are actually in the magnet programs, you surely have those numbers and percentages wrong as well.  That is yet another reason why the much higher numbers of NMSF at TJ matter more than any percentages you might offer up about the percentage of students in RM's smaller IB program who are NMSF. The former speaks more clearly to where most of the top students in the region live and whether they prefer AP and higher level courses to IB.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics