Reply to Is it true that more Congressional man hours were spent on Benghazi than 9/11?

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Is it true that more Congressional man hours were spent on Benghazi than 9/11?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote]
Yep, because it certainly can't be for delivering any new answers on Benghazi.... because thus far he hasn't been able to come up with jack.[/quote]

Like every other serious scandal--Benghazi is just the tip.  I don't know what the "there" is, but a very serious infraction at State has been revealed: the classified information on Clinton's server and the cavalier way in which this has been handled by State and the administration.  This is a very serious infraction and Petraeus was convicted for much, much less.  The fact that State knew there was highly classified material on the thumb drive under the control of Clinton's attorney and did not immediately secure it is a serious departure from SOP.   That is just a start.  The fact that Hillary had highly classified information on her server and computer,--and, probably Huma, as well, is an egregious infraction.  Did Hillary also have this on her phone and Blackberry?  Where else was this material?

Hillary is supposed to know what information is classified.  She had the right to classify material--and yet she had some of the most highly classified material available on her server--and a thumb drive?  HOw many thumb drives are out there with highly classified information on it?  The fact that the material was/is not marked is not sufficient.  It might pass on "Secret" information--but Hillary should certainly know "top  secret" when she sees it.

It is against the rules to put your thumb drive into a government computer.  There are reasons for this.
 
 
[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics