Reply to Is it true that more Congressional man hours were spent on Benghazi than 9/11?

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Is it true that more Congressional man hours were spent on Benghazi than 9/11?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote]What is it that they think only exists uniquely on Hillary's email server? Don't they understand that emails typically have a sender and a recipient? For every email that Hillary sent or received, there is a copy in existence with the outside sender or receiver. And where it comes to Benghazi, there would only have been a very limited number of senders and recipients. Hadn't they thought to subpoena those? [/quote]

Well, it turns out that she did not turn over all her Benghazi emails--and we do not necessarily know who else was on her email list--example: she did not turn over Blumenthal emails--possibly because she assumed no one would know she was emailing Blumenthal.  Who else was she emailing outside the government?  How can we know?

Huma was also on Clintonemail--so those emails might be revealing.  It is rumored that Mills was also on it--but that is being denied.

Problem is, that unless you know exactly with whom Hillary was communicating,  you don't know which emails to subpoena.  That is why her emails should have been on her government server.  We don't know who else is involved and where she was getting her advice.

They have been trying to subpoena those related to Benghazi.  But, Clinton has not been exactly cooperative.  Had she been, this would have been over long ago.  
[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics