Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Is it true that more Congressional man hours were spent on Benghazi than 9/11?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]Is their some basis for their belief in malfeasance? If so, that should be all the evidence they need. The problem is, there doesn't seem to be any solid or meaningful evidence to support their belief in malfeasance. What is it that they think only exists uniquely on Hillary's email server? Don't they understand that emails typically have a sender and a recipient? For every email that Hillary sent or received, there is a copy in existence with the outside sender or receiver. And where it comes to Benghazi, there would only have been a very limited number of senders and recipients. Hadn't they thought to subpoena those? Why the fixation on her email server? Do they somehow bizarrely think the smoking gun evidence is hidden in emails that Hillary sent to her self for some reason? Seriously, a lack of logical or critical thinking manifests itself here...[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
