Reply to Why believe in god?

Forum Index » Religion

Reply to "Why believe in god?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]OP here. Jesus is not the first story of the son of a god, born on Dec 25th, of a virgin, and resurrected in the spring. Understanding these aspects of religious history, how is it possible to truly believe one story and not another?  Do those of you who believe have any knowledge of religious history or do you prefer to blind yourself to these realities?[/quote]

Of course. I'd guesstimate that 95% of Christians in the US are aware that December 25th is not Jesus' true birthdate. He probably wasn't born in 0 AD, either, but more like 3AD or 4AD.

Nobody is "blind" to this. Nobody is pretending that we actually know Jesus' true birthdate.

Reasonable people understand that lots of facts are lost to time, and Jesus' birthday is one of them. To celebrate his birth, somebody had to pick a day, and they picked December 25, probably because it coincided with other festivals. As good a day as any other.

The big reveal about 12/25 isn't going to shatter anybody's faith, because we all know it already. If you were Christian, you'd understand that this is a big ho-hum, because the magical part isn't the arbitrary 12/25 date, it's the birth itself. [/quote]

and faithful christians also don't find it odd that several other ancient gods were born on the that day, and/or had virgin mothers and died and rose again.   It doesn't occur to them (and they are certainly not taught) that Jesus as son of god is simply an updated myth.  People with faith understand these things.[/quote]

You need to read up on the history of early Christianity.  The Christians sought converts by appropriating other traditions, and this is well known to modern Christians.  The fact that they did so does not disprove who Jesus is nor does it disprove the existence of God.  What it proves is that the early Christians were very shrewd strategists when it came to recruiting converts.  Again, this has nothing to do with theology.  [/quote]

It proves that they had deceitful intents and were willing to fudge details in order to get what they wanted. [/quote]

Are you OP?  Either way you have a very simplistic worldview and it's not really worth engaging with someone who is so uneducated about the topic at hand.[/quote]

Not OP. Imho if Christ's followers lied about his birthdate in order to take over a pagan holiday, that's deceitful no matter what the intent behind it. I don't believe they knew better than those who celebrated the Solstice. It was deceitful plain and simple.[/quote]

Your insistence on deceit in choosing a day of the year to celebrate Christ's birth is quite astonishing.  You clearly are a very black and white person who doesn't know the difference between literal and figurative truth.  Your insistence on a very rigid sense of literal truth is scary to tell you the truth.  I am very relieved you are not religious as such insistence on literalness is what makes for the very worst of religious extremists and zealots.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics