Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Relationship Discussion (non-explicit)
Reply to "Family life sucks"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]The newborn and toddler years are really hard. And we live in a society with few family support policies[b] (daycare costs a lot, housing costs a lot, maternity leave is typically unpaid). [/b] These are some reasons the birth rate is falling. For me, parenthood has been wonderful and so worth it for the love and fulfillment. There have been a lot of hard days. But the joy and beauty outweigh them. [/quote] Perhaps it could be because wages are higher here and housing costs lower (and homes generally larger), but [b]birth rates are falling across all western countries.[/b] Generous paid leave is inversely correlated with the birth rate. My unpopular opinion is that government leave makes it worse. In most European countries, the paid leave is at a low wage (similar to unemployment here) and women are expected to take it. This means every woman who has a kid is expected to stay home for a long period of time to earn low wages from the government. Women still have to work, especially since wages are generally lower, but they are second class citizens at work since it’s assumed they are away for years having children. Do I want to have another kid and instead of working earn $300 a week? No thanks. [/quote] It's not just western countries. It's all developed/industrialized countries (except Israel). I like the Nordic model for parental leave, which offers equal bonding time for fathers, but fathers have to take the leave separately from the mothers. It encourages dads to be primary caregivers early in their child's life. And it seems to be working based on research on time spent parenting by gender.[/quote] And they also aren’t having enough kids. Not only do the women have to suffer, but now the men too. Having children means you’re kept from working. The Norwegian model is especially suffocating. Long, required parental leaves. Most jobs are uninspiring due to the oil money. Very average salaries. Not outsourcing anything. [/quote] Should someone cry for the men who are “forced” to take PAID parental leave?[/quote] Not cry. You’re missing the point. Preventing men from going to work after having a baby isn’t a way to increase the birth rate. It does the opposite. [/quote] Please cite evidence that any country forces a father to take parental leave?[/quote] It’s not forced but it’s strongly encouraged and the system is structured to incentivize the leave. Now both parents take significant time away from work and don’t have access to childcare. You don’t have to be a genius to figure out that some (many?) people don’t want this. [/quote] Wait, now it’s not forced, just encouraged, and you still think men are victims? And what do you mean “don’t have access to childcare”? It’s illegal to pay for someone to care for your child? Where is this?[/quote] I don’t think anyone is a “victim.” I simply think having men stay home for long periods of time after a baby is not helping increase the birth rate. By not having access to childcare, I mean daycares are generally unavailable since it is assumed that a parent is home for an entire year after birth. Also due to the lower wages and high taxes, it’s rare for a woman to be able to hire a nanny or babysitter for a baby. That’s just not something that is commonly done. Instead, the women are expected to stay home for a year after the birth. These cultures are homogenous and being unique and deciding to return to work right away will not be treated kindly. There is a lot of pressure to conform to what everyone does. You don’t go against the grain. Regardless of how generous the paid leave and social benefits are, do you think women in the US would decide to have more babies if they limited daycares to babies a year or older? What if men were pressured to stay home for a few months? It all sounds great in theory, but at the individual level many people don’t want to do that. These are just my observations from having friends in Nordic countries. While their benefits are generous, it seems way more disruptive to have a child there. Also, the parental leave isn’t fully paid for most higher earning jobs. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics