Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Money and Finances
Reply to "40% of people making 500K/year are living paycheck to paycheck"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]People in that $400K range are in a tougher spot than it looks. On paper, it seems like a big jump from $250K–$300K, but the math doesn’t play out that way. A $250K–$300K household might take home around $180K–$210K after taxes. A $400K household might net about $240K–$260K. So the gap after taxes is already much smaller than people expect. Now layer in retirement. The Social Security Administration replaces a meaningful portion of income for mid-level earners, but much less for higher earners. At $250K–$300K, you might only need to save $20K–$40K a year. At $400K, that jumps to $60K–$90K+ because you have to self-fund most of your retirement. Once you subtract that, the numbers start to converge. A $250K–$300K household could have around $150K–$180K to spend. A $400K household, saving what they need to, could end up in a very similar range, roughly $150K–$170K. That’s the surprising part. You’re earning a lot more, but not necessarily living on a lot more. The result is a compressed outcome. The system takes more in taxes on the way up, and at the same time expects higher earners to save significantly more because they get less relative support later. So a large portion of that additional income is effectively locked away. That’s why it can feel like a tough tradeoff. You push into that “entry rich” range, but the real, usable income doesn’t scale the way people assume.[/quote] And here’s the part people really don’t see coming. Lower and mid-income households still get credits and tax advantages that phase out as income rises. Once you’re in the $300K+ range, most of these are gone. Examples of what phases out: Child Tax Credit: up to $2K per child 0% capital gains bracket (vs 15–20% for higher earners) Premium tax credits (health insurance subsidies, can be thousands/year) Student loan interest deduction Saver’s Credit for retirement contributions Now look at the math: $275K household (2 kids) Take-home after taxes: ~$195K Child tax credits: +$4K Lower capital gains taxes / other breaks: +$3K–$5K Savings needed: ~$25K Spendable: ~$175K–$180K $400K household (2 kids) Take-home after taxes: ~$250K Credits: $0 (phased out) Higher capital gains taxes Savings needed: ~$70K–$90K Spendable: ~$160K–$180K The wild part After taxes, lost credits, and required savings: A $275K household can end up with the same or even slightly more usable money than a $400K household. That’s the real compression. Higher income looks much bigger on paper, but a lot of it disappears through taxes, lost benefits, and the need to self-fund retirement. This is the problem of our budensome tax system unitl you can break out to the 1m+ you really are just the same as 250-300k[/quote] The only actual difference between the 275k and 400k households is that the 275k household got up to 9K more in tax credits and tax breaks. Is this what they are crying about? They are making 125k more but crying about not receiving the same 9k in tax benefits? Cry me a river. [/quote] The difference in taxes is almost double: $400K pays $150K in taxes $275K pays $80K in taxes So yes, $125 more income, but also $70K more paid in taxes. In the end, only a $55K difference in take home pay.[/quote] No one making 400k is paying $150k in taxes, Let me give you the correct numbers. Gross income: $400k Standard Deduction: $32,200 Taxable Income: $367,800 Estimated Federal Taxes: $73k Gross income: $275k Standard Deduction: Standard Deduction: $32,200 Taxable Income: $242,800 Estimated Federal Taxes: $43k Even if you add state taxes on top of that, they would still be far away from $150k. Most earners at that income itemized deductions and pay even less. [/quote] You left out FICA. Someone in CA making 400k a year is paying around 74k in federal tax, 18k in FICA, and 29k in state tax for a total of roughly 121k in income taxes (I.e., doesn’t include property tax).[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics