Reply to what's the difference btw William & Mary and Wake?

Forum Index » College and University Discussion

Reply to "what's the difference btw William & Mary and Wake?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Wake has lots of rich kids. W&M prob less so.[/quote]
Wake has better ROI and can compete outside of regional placement for jobs.  It will get closer to top 25 in a few years. [/quote]
Wak is nowhere near being a top 25
[/quote]

Dp, but why this again.  [b]When us news decides to eliminate the dei factors it’s used for the last year or two[/b], Wake will likely be back on the T30, just as it was for over 25 straight years.
[/quote]

But we all know they won't, and since Wake isn't really looking to grow research they'll continue to be punished[/quote]

So will William and Mary, the schools excel based on class size and having full professors teachers.  The research factors are less than 5 percent of score and focus only on overall number of citations.  Schools the size of Wake or William and Mary simply can’t compete with the the large flagships on this criteria, they don’t have the same raw numbers of faculty.

[/quote]

W&M is certainly trying to grow research now that it's R1. Will obviously never be able to compete with flagships but it can probably catch up to bigger research privates [/quote]

Doubtful, it doesn’t even have a medical school. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics