Reply to February 26 School Board Vote on Providing Transportation for Rezoned Students

Forum Index » Fairfax County Public Schools (FCPS)

Reply to "February 26 School Board Vote on Providing Transportation for Rezoned Students"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous]Below is what the idiot McDaniel sent out via email.  Families received a survey less than a week ago and many were missed.  In most cases the logic of the depot has the same stupid logic as only busing seniors - you are not maximizing the number of students on a bus or you having everyone get in their cars from a neighborhood or two and drive a few miles away instead of the bus stopping at a few neighborhood intersections.  Maybe there are some random cases that makes sense but looking at high school boundary adjustments in most cases that is not logical.  Security detail for the superintendent and more than one full-time staff member for board members are nice to haves.

MCDANIEL EMAIL COMMENTS:
Also last night, the School Board approved transportation services for high school students (grades 10-12) who are authorized to remain at their old base school as a result of recently adopted boundary changes. You may recall that this decision came before the School Board earlier this year; however, a 5-0-5 vote resulted in it being brought back last night.
Following an extensive outreach effort to families impacted by boundary changes, the Superintendent recommended transportation services only for 12th graders. I was unwilling to support that for several reasons, mostly because a bus carrying a 12th grader can also carry 10th and 11th graders.
After weeks of this decision being on the agenda, an 11th-hour amendment was brought forward to vastly expand bussing services from 12th graders to 5th, 6th, 7th, 8th, 10th, 11th, and 12th graders. This ballooned the annual budget impact from $800,000 to over $3,000,000. The timing of this proposal was a bit ironic because the next day the School Board and Board of Supervisors held its annual joint budget meeting, and the message was clear: this is not the time to unnecessarily increase spending on nice-to-have items.
There is another key piece of information that helped inform my decision last night: survey results indicated that 44% of students would need transportation to remain at their old base school; this represented 154 students, which extrapolates to 300 students based on the response rate. The other respondents were moving to the new school or were legally required to be provided transportation anyway (ie students with IEPs and 504s). This is to say that the decision last night was around whether to spend $3,000,000 per year to bus 300 kids above and beyond what is already done. That is not even close to reasonable. 
Throughout this process, the biggest concern I heard from constituents was regarding changes for high school students, and the unique period in their lives (academically and socially) that these years represent, and the academic and extracurricular records that feed into college applications. I wanted to find a way to target transportation supports to those students, but only if it could be done within existing budget constraints. I worked with the Superintendent to explore options, and it was concluded that a hub transportation model could be established for high school students within existing funding for the most part. The hub system is very similar to how students are transported to Thomas Jefferson. Out of an abundance of caution, I also placed language in my substitute motion that in the event of cost increases, end-of-year funding could be used to cover those.
I am happy that my proposal was adopted by the School Board last night, and that high school students will be given transportation should they choose. I recognize that some families at the middle and elementary levels will be disappointed, and I share that disappointment. I am disappointed that there is a $43 million budget gap that is threatening other critical initiatives too (Middle School After School programming, advanced academic resource teachers, reducing class sizes, maintaining special education staffing support, and more).
When I made the motion to adopt this plan, I stated that this strikes the best balance between addressing the equity concerns that have been raised and recognizing the fiscal reality of the day. While we could not get there for all 7 grade levels, I am happy that we were able to get there for 3 of them.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics