Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Religion
Reply to "Christians against ICE"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Many appalling campaigns have been undertaken throughout western history in the name of Christianity. A few choice examples - Crusades The Inquisition The support of the slave trade Oh, and that thing that happened to Galileo Christians need to get off their high horse when picking and choosing their cause celebre. [/quote] Slavery has always existed and still exists today in very large numbers. Christians were among the first to end it at significant scale. Universities and modern science are a result of the Christian church. The crusades were a response to Muslim colonization and conquest. Educate yourself.[/quote] The one who needs an education is you. You can’t really claim Christians ended slavery without mentioning that Christians started and sustained the transatlantic slave trade for centuries using the Bible as their primary legal defense. If it takes 1,800 years for a religion to decide ‘maybe kidnapping people is bad,’ that’s not exactly a moral head start. Abolition happened because of a shift toward secular humanism and Enlightenment values that forced the Church to finally change its mind. The Church didn’t 'invent' science. It preserved some Greek and Roman texts, while it also occasionally burned or banned them. And let’s not forget the Islamic Golden Age, which gave us algebra, optics, and the foundations of modern medicine while Europe was still in the Dark Ages. If the Church was so pro-science, why did it take until 1992 for them to officially admit Galileo was right about the Earth moving? While the First Crusade was indeed framed as a response to the Byzantine Emperor’s plea for help against Seljuk advances, the subsequent centuries of Crusades involved complex political ambitions, the horrific sack of Christian Constantinople (1204), and the persecution of Jewish communities in Europe. To frame them solely as a defensive response overlooks the territorial and papal power struggles that fueled the era. You can now count yourself as having been schooled.[/quote] So because one new trade route was created for a practice that had been in existence for millennia, they are responsible. No one buys that lame as& argument. Read a history book and get back to us.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics