Reply to Blood type changed during pregnancy

Forum Index » Expectant and Postpartum Moms

Reply to "Blood type changed during pregnancy"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Why do any pregnancy care then? Why do ultrasounds? If things don't work out and the baby or mom does it's just meant to be, right?[/quote]
Because we have science. Again, your whataboutism doesn’t work here. [/quote]

Science that develop the shot for rh incapability? That same science? [/quote]
I don’t know why you can’t seem to understand that I’m not against people receiving the shot for Rh incompatibility once a child that is at risk has already been created. I’m not against modern medicine. I simply believe that Rh positive and Rh negative people are not meant to have children together.[/quote]

What is the meaning of “meant”? What entity is decreeing this? [/quote]
What I mean by that is that they’re incompatible. It has negative consequences that are only mitigated by Rhogam.[/quote]

DP. "Meant" is a term that comes with connotation as well as denotation. It implies intent or design.

I had my aortic heart valve replaced when I was 17, because the bicuspid, malformed valve had calcified and I was in critical heart failure. I wasn't "meant" to live. I think there is nothing wrong with using modern medicine to live anyway.

A three year old with acute lymphoblastic leukemia isn't "meant" to live by your rhetoric. 
1. Do you think it's okay for him to get chemotherapy and live a normal life?
2. He was preprogrammed to die before puberty, so would you say he wasn't "meant" to live until reproductive age and have children? Or do you think he wasn't "meant" to have children, and if so, what does that mean?[/quote]
!. Yes.
2. I need to stop using the word meant because that is not the message that I'm trying to convey. I cannot determine what is meant to happen. I can only infer based on what I know from looking at the facts.

Here's my question for you. Would you agree that Rh incompatibility (without the intervention of modern medicine) is disadvantageous to the survival and wellness of offspring?[/quote]

Why don’t you clarify wtf you mean then? If you are trying to say that evolution might select against rH incompatibility that theory would require the development of some kind of way for people to be less attracted to people with different rH status. Plausible but not sure it could be studied that directly. If you are trying to say that fetuses with rH incompatibility get miscarried (ie we have evolved to miscarry them) because they are less fit (apart from the rH issue) I don’t think that is provable. What the actual issue is, is one of many biological life threatening issues that exist due to the randomness of life, that humans can now fix with technology. If anything suggests something about evolution here, it is that our brains’ ability to solve problems has been selected for because it allows us to fix issues with our offspring so our genes get into the next generation. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics