Reply to Realignment for SEC

Forum Index » Jobs and Careers

Reply to "Realignment for SEC"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I’m hearing many many unqualified people are getting elevated into seniority roles to fill the many many vacancies… what a shame. There’s no re-org that will fix these issues [/quote]

The better question is, why on earth would anyone want those senior roles??[/quote]

They pay better than junior roles. Plus easier to get a private sector job if you’re in a senior role.[/quote]

Not by much. And all you do these days is (a) approve timesheets and leave requests, (b) deny ad hoc telework requests, then spend 2 hours explaining why, (c) doing all the work bc half your staff (the best ones) took Vera/drp. Sounds fun.

And good luck with that private sector work. If there are no enf actions, law firms don’t want you. But at least you get a window office. [/quote]

It depends on your role.  In the last couple of weeks, law 360 has had a bunch of articles about people leaving for firm jobs.

And the pay, it depends on where you are.  16s and 17s top out at the same point, but if you are a 14 you are looking at a non-nominal raise.  And SOs make more than 17s.

I agree that some of the administrative tasks of a supervisor suck, and they probably suck more now than they do normally, but I don’t know how much of a reason that is to not pursue a promotion.[/quote]

The SO positions are a ONE YEAR term. (with possibility of conversion, but do you trust anyone here? those positions are a good way to get unceremoniously booted quickly.)

Also a SEC 14 jumping to a 15 or a 17 or an SO position still only gets a 10% raise.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics