Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Religion
Reply to "Do churches generate a lot of revenue from the LGBT community?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]First off, I am an atheist. Admittedly, I have a cynical view of religion. Also, my vantage point is Bethesda. I can't help but notice that pretty much every church I see has a flag, placard, or message out front targeting a single demographic: the LGBT community. Not asians, not hispanics, not men, not women, not young, not old - LGBT. Churches exist for one reason: to propagate themselves. That requires money and customers. So, it must be that singularly advertising to LGBT is a smart business move. Its just a surprising one, given the % of population and, I would think, I general dis-inclination toward religion. So what is the deal? Smart business move? Meaningless signaling? Something else? [/quote] Those aren't real churches [/quote] Folks, here is the poster who thinks that Protestant denominations that have been mainstays of religious life in the US since the nation’s founding aren’t “real churches.” Draw your own conclusions.[/quote] Objectively, it isn’t that. It’s that there is literally a “guidebook” that identifies what God considers sinful behavior. It’s called the Bible. And engaging in homosexual acts is specifically called out as a sin in the word of God—several times. So are many many other sins. And each of us sin on a daily basis. Yet we are all welcome and in fact called by by God to worship Him and to confess our sin, repent of that sin (whatever it may be), and accept that on the cross, Christ took the punishment for OUR sins…all of them…paying the price for us and allowing us to live forever with God in heaven. One would think that the churches that put out the LGBTQ+ flag are signaling “yes—you are welcome here, too. ALL are welcome to come and worship the Lord and repent of whatever sin is keeping hold of you. Jesus is the answer to setting you free from whatever sin is defining you, including sexual sin and sins of lust or idolatry, regardless of orientation.” But instead, the message from these churches that put out the LGBT flag seems to be “we promise we will value your self-identification as part of the LGBT community above any Biblical teaching. If you come to this church, we will affirm your desire to keep this area of your life off limits to God and you can hang onto this particular sin because you really really like it and society has decided it’s who you are.” These are “real” churches, but they have been ideologically captured at the seminary level by folks who are more interested in pleasing society than obeying and submitting to God. The church also welcomes those who are divorced or having premarital sex or who eat shellfish or who tell lies or who have dishonored their parents, etc. The difference is that they do not celebrate those sins as being who you are. Instead they recognize that we are all sinners worthy of love from God and are invited and called to repent. [/quote] This is an excellent post. I would add — Sexuality is one area where for 2,000 years — from Jesus giving the Sermon on the Mount until very recently — all three major parts of Christianity — the RCC, mainline Protestants, and Evangelicals — agreed that sex was to be between a man and a woman in the covenant relationship of a marriage, period. This was one area where there was basically no daylight amongst Christians. And then in the last 40 years or so — so a very small period of time across the broad spectrum of world history — mainline Protestant churches have attempted to redefine this core part of Christianity because of societal pressure. Nevermind that aspects of Christianity have ALWAYS been offensive in every culture and age. Back in the days of the Romans, people could not understand why these silly Christians opposed rape, all kinds of other horrific misgony, and literally throwing babies into trash cans when you didn’t like that a girl popped out. Christians believed these very counter-cultural things at the time because that’s what the Bible says. But these mainline Protestant churches have unilaterally decided on very flimsy theological grounds that it’s OK to ignore certain teachings now because they aren’t fashionable. They don’t want Christianity that is true to the Bible and counter-cultural — they want a Christianity that fits into their larger political view. I absolutely believe that this is part of the reason why these churches are on the decline while evangelical churches everywhere and even RCC churches in some places continue to grow. [/quote] If it makes you happy to believe these congregations are in decline, that's fine. It's not my experience, given the growth at my church, but I also don't care that you think that and maybe it bears put natuonally, I don't know. [b]It is, however, a little silly to believe that LGBT and ally members are a big constituency that chuches want to attract, yet also the reason for severe membership decline. [/b][/quote] To the contrary, being hostile towards LGBTQ+ is contributing to membership decline, because GenX and younger are much more accepting and are turned off by the hierarchy's homophobia. Lack of ordained women's roles in the Church is another issue causing young people to abandon the faith.[/quote] This simply isn’t true. As this thread shows, there are plenty of churches that specifically market themselves as being LGBTQ “welcoming” and have ordained female ministers — those are the same churches that have generally undergone the dramatic membership declines. It is not that people can’t find such a church. On the contrary, the churches that have stuck to more orthodox Christian principles — mainly non-denominational churches but also some smaller Presbyterian and Anglican sects — these have experienced the most growth. My non-denom church is packed on Sunday morning — easily 3,000-4,000 people across two services. I drive 40 minutes to get there. Along the way, I pass by tons of churches like the OP noted. I always observe mostly empty parking lots. Just out of pure curiosity, I have gone onto the websites for some of these churches and tried watching their services after they were done, just to compare them to my church. I can see why the parking lots are mostly empty — the sermons are boring, long on progressive politics and short on Jesus and the cross, the music is bad, the average age in the congregation looks to be 100. Who really wants to go to that church? My church is young (I am in my 40s and definitely not young by its standards), vibrant, fresh, engaging, intellectual, and completely focused on Jesus along with some application to your real life. The reason why people have stopped going to church is multi-faceted and can’t be boiled down to a single reason. The best book on this subject if anyone really wants to dive into it is “The Great Dechurching.” But it isn’t that Christianity has become unwelcoming to LGBTQ. There are plenty of churches that have gone out of their way in the opposite direction. [/quote] Please. It is true. I worked for the Catholic Church. It may not be the sole reason but it is one of many, and a significant one at that. I attend a left-leaning RCC church which is "young, vibrant, fresh, engaging, intellectual, and focused on Jesus along with application to your real life" and openly accepts gay people. It does make a difference to be involved in a parish that does not weaponize its faith against its adherents. While I am aware of the growth of nondenominational Christian churches, your n should not equal 1 and I'm sure I would find the music at your Church bad. Christian rock/pop is generally pretty boring, because ime it lacks a good melody and dynamics.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics