Reply to What does tabling the SSIMS closure mean for the boundary options?

Forum Index » Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)

Reply to "What does tabling the SSIMS closure mean for the boundary options?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]My takeis that this person is likely zoned to Woodlin or Flora Singer and doesn't want to go to SSIMS. They were relieved when the closure was proposed bc it meant they didn't have to go there (as many of the A-D options have them doing). And now that the Save our Schools people have successfully gotten a delay, they are mad at them.

That's the only explanation that makes sense. Nothing that the Save our Schools people have put out (on their yard signs, on their web site, social media, etc) has been about keeping current students zoned to SSIMS at SSIMS. It has all been about keeping the schools open and renovating them in place. [/quote]

If that's the case, it would be a miscomprehension of the import of the delay.  MCPS would have to include in the upcoming elementary study under which they would fit that delay authorization to change the middle school zoning, anyway, and have it effective at the same time (starting in the fall of 27).

If the closure is a foregone conclusion and the delay for engagement more of a formality than an opportunity to keep the school open, those communities almost certainly would be staying at Sligo MS, though Sligo, itself, and some portion of the current SSIMS catchment then apportioned to Sligo, would occupy the SSIMS structure as a holding school for a couple of years.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics