Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)
Reply to "Second round options for Woodward boundary study "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]It's very unfair to Whitman families. More diversity should be added in Whitman. Leaving it untouched is a missed oppurtunity.[/quote] I think the vast majority of Whitman families disagree. Most just won’t publicly admit it. [/quote] Well, people buy in Whitman for certain reason. If they wanted diversity then they would have bought some where else.[/quote] But to that argument, no school boundaries should change. Any current homeowner who bought into an area that is now being changed has the same argument. And then nothing ever changes. So while I don’t disagree with the premise, it has to only apply to some and not others, so it’s an entirely circular argument. The Whitman families just seem to have extra interest in preserving their status. [/quote] The history of self segregation should tell you that it won’t matter if you change the boundaries. So yes it is circular in that way.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
