Reply to Pseudo prestigious privates

Forum Index » College and University Discussion

Reply to "Pseudo prestigious privates"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Why is “harder to get into” relevant regarding quality of education? [/quote]
There's hundreds of quality schools, we only care about the exclusive ones. We suddenly play facetious when it comes to Emory's (or schools like it) selectivity. Its great your DC can get an equal or near equal education at Uva, Wake, William and Mary etc. Your child still couldn't get into Emory or WashU and you know that matters or you wouldn't be so bitter about it. [/quote]

The majority of UVA students could get into Emory.  No doubt about it.  Most instate students don’t even think about Emory though because with UVA available going to Emory makes no sense. [/quote]
UVA is an easier admit in-state than Emory. Not even close.
UVA is a much, much easier admit oos than Emory. [/quote]

Not sure where you are going with this, Emory is a prettty easy admit ED from most private high schools.  It has over a 30 percent admit rate.  OOS UVA admit is below 20 percent.[/quote]
Emory ED includes both athletes and legacy. [/quote]

Emory is a D3 school that doesn’t field football or lacrosse teams.  They have fewer recruited athlete than most SLACs.   [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics