Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Relationship Discussion (non-explicit)
Reply to "past sexual history and financial status"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]quote]DP here, but I get this. I don’t understand why women are fighting you on it. If you are a woman who likes to have sex, you should marry a man who likes that about you. There are plenty of them out there. It’s ridiculous to hide this fact about yourself and go on to spend your life with a man who thinks that a woman who enjoys sex is shameful. You will be miserable together.[/quote] The issue is that a woman with a low body count may love sex. Typically, this type of woman enjoys it in the context of a long-term relationship. And, it's far from given that a woman has a high body count simply because she enjoys sex. The idea that "I enjoy sex" does not mean that "I need a high body count to do so". Many women love and enjoy sex, and have done so with two or three long-term partners before getting married. Often, these women would have actually had more sex with a steady, long-term partner (and learned more about what they enjoy) than another woman who had 10 short-term partners during the same period. Many women who claim their total number of partners "doesn't matter" are actually triggered by the thought of being judged by that number. Admit it, let's move on. If you find a man who does not want a woman because she has had a material number of previous partners, move on. The great thing about dating is that everyone can look for someone who meets their needs and accepts them for who they are. [/quote] The issue is that modern dating implies dating different people until exclusivity. [b]Almost no man is dating exclusively[/b]. So yes, it’s completely unreasonable to expect that a woman would be able to jump straight into LTRs without any shorter term attempts at relationships before. No matter how much she enjoys committed sex.its just unrealistic to expect that a woman would delay sex or anyone would stay with her without sex before marriage/moving in. I enjoy committed sex but had several 3-6 months relationships in between long term mega relationships, because I realized the men were just not the right for for me so I kept searching. Or the man met somone else which also happens. None of these shorter relationships started from a one night stand - usually it was a full month before I slept with a man. [/quote] Apparently the new thing is for men to insist women stop using the dating app they matched on, before their first date or before theyve even met. These men are so afraid of being "one upped" by another man that they demand exclusivity before even seeing them with their own eyes in person. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics