Reply to What right do we have to tell Iran they can’t have nuclear bombs?

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "What right do we have to tell Iran they can’t have nuclear bombs?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]What right do democrats have to tell me I shouldn’t be allowed to have an AR-15?

[/quote]

No one has obliterated your AR-15
 
I trust Iran more than I trust Trump and sycophants.
[/quote]

Of course you do. Not even the least little bit surprised to hear you say that.

You Progs hate other Americans far more than you’d ever dislike an enemy of our country. We know that. We’ve always known that. You’d rather see us dead instead.

We know. [/quote]

[b]No one is trying to take away your rifle or pistol[/b] and Iran isn't shooting up our kids in schools or churches or grocery stores every other day. So weighing the bigger threat, it's 100% Americans with guns meant for war. [/quote]

I love how libs always start posts like this one ^^^ with something like [i]“nO oNe Is tRyInG tO tAkE yUr gUNz aWaY![/i]”…. And then they proceed to explain why we should take everyone’s guns away. That’s some hilarious sh!t right there 😆[/quote]

Wow. Talk about a lack of comprehension. We used to have an AR ban and mass shootings were down. ARs are directly connected to our mass shootings. Can we own bombs? What about grenades? Define "Arms"?

WELL REGULATED is a phrase that's a part of the 2nd amendment. But whatever, cling on tight to that machine gun. It's what Jesus would do, right? [/quote]

Oh my comprehension is just fine, thanks.

Here’s a homework assignment for ya:

Look into what the phrase “well regulated” meant in the context of 1791 prose.

Hint: it doesn’t mean “subjected to lots of rules, laws, regulations or……. [i]infringements[/i]. [/quote]

1791 the US military was under 1000 people. Therefore the govt wanted militas as a backup plan made of citizens.[b] Well regulated didn't mean red tape but it did mean rules, structure and training[/b]. Not to mention it took 30 seconds to reload a gun then, an AR can slaughter a classroom of kids in 30 seconds.

Fast forward to now, you have twisted it to desperately cling onto your machine guns and we have the largest and most robust military in the world. At the very least we should have background checks and training requirements and a limit on what type of weapon an average citizen can own. [/quote]

You have failed.

That is not the period-correct definition of the word “regulated”. [/quote]

Is this what brain on MAGA looks like? [/quote]

+1
Let’s now define militia. Hint- it’s not you and your personal armory. [/quote]

Hint- Thomas Jefferson was asked this very same question, and he’s already defined it.

“It is the whole of the People”

So yeah, that indeed IS me and my personal armory.

And you, too. You can borrow one of my AR’s, if I think you’re responsible enough not to accidentally shoot yourself or someone else. [/quote]

Well first of all “whole of the people” to TJ was not really as broad as you are trying to claim. “Whole of the people” did not include women or black people so your reliance on this statement to prove that gun ownership is a universal right falls apart completely. Then add in the part about “well regulated” and you have lost the argument that every person should own an AR without restriction. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics