Reply to Williams vs Bowdoin?

Forum Index » College and University Discussion

Reply to "Williams vs Bowdoin? "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]
Sounds like what I learned in Intermediate quantum mechanics.... [b]It's just interferometers and wave/particle behavior.[/b] I don't know how this is confusing any scientist.[/quote]

Literally neither are mentioned in the index for the textbook for Williams 202.

What you consider “intermediate quantum mechanics” is what Williams considers introductory modern physics. Intermediate QM is 301, which is very different from 202. [/quote]
You may be able to do physics, but you are clearly illiterate. Hope you take an English course sometimes soon.[/quote]

You have been consistently wrong and obstinate about the curriculums not having substantial differences, and keep doubling down with rudeness in the face of contradicting info. (Not very scientific of you!) But if someone cares, the textbook title for Williams 202 is Waves and Oscillations by WF Smith. It is not an intermediate QM book, but is a useful prep for (and thus relevant to) intermediate QM. Titles for courses can often be found through a college’s online bookstore. [/quote]

No one cares. Please stop. Go back to your physics and leave us alone.[/quote]

Physics is everywhere.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics