Reply to Elrich proposes MoCo property tax increase

Forum Index » Metropolitan DC Local Politics

Reply to "Elrich proposes MoCo property tax increase"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Here's an idea: how about the county cuts some spending rather than raising taxes?[/quote]

The council is looking for cuts. Problem is, they can't cut MCPS at all because of state law, so the cuts are to other services that take a disproportionate share of the reductions.

They could refuse to go over maintenance of effort for MCPS. Treat it as a ceiling and not a floor. Nobody will do that as they ramp up for reelection.

[/quote]

The Council recently voted in two cuts...[i]to developer costs[/i] via Evan Glass' bill 22-24 and Andrew Friedson's & Natali Fani-Gonzalez's bill 2-25.  One deferred tax collection, the other effectivelly eliminated it for mamy years for certain conversion projects.

Each was expedited, making public review more difficult.  Each was put forward with measures to make them retroactive, applying to projects that clearly did not need the support.

Each failed to provide conditions to ensure the public cost was not borne in cases where it might not be needed.  Each failed to account for its own budget effect and/or infrastructure burden, leaving a resulting need to cut programs, increase taxes or issue bonds in future years.  Each typified the kinds of legislation put forth by the Council and obviated the constituencies the Council favors: the developer/real estate industry and incoming residents over neighborhoods and current residents.

Each was [i]vetoed[/i] by Elrich, but the first had its veto overridden by the entire Council and the second likely will see the same, with only Jawando positioning himself differently in the lead-up to the next election.[/quote]

This was all spot on. Today the council overrode Elrich’s veto of their new developer giveaway.[/quote]

So we know that each of the Councilmembers gunning for the County Executive seat, whether declared or not, is an eminently accountable party to causing Montgomery County's underfunding and, therefore, the additional tax burden (with clear benefit to particular constituencies, much the same as the upcoming benefit, nationally, to the very wealthy at the expense of the broad majority bearing tarriff burdens).

The question is whether MoCo voters might look for someone outside the Council, given how poorly they have performed as stewards of residents' interests, to fill that seat, with Elrich now term-limited.  Or will any of Glass, Friedson or Jawando (who rather conveniently for someone pursuing the office found a voice, ineffective as it was, against Friedson's proposal, and rather suddenly, too, given prior positioning) -- or any of their Council peers who might throw their hat in the ring -- simply waltz into office once dispatching the others in the primary, cementing and furthering the structural deficits they've created with not even a veto (meaningless as Elrich's have been) to slow things down.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics