Reply to I go to a top LAC for history and stem. It is overrated.

Forum Index » College and University Discussion

Reply to "I go to a top LAC for history and stem. It is overrated."

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I call troll. The title says the OP studies history and STEM, but by the first line history is gone and now it's English. A real student wouldn't mix up their own major.

The LAC hater got creative this time - so weird though. [/quote]

Ditto. I surprised at so many pages of commentary for a troll thread.[/quote]
This is actually one of the more constructive threads I've read on DCUM -- perhaps because the OP was so obviously a troll.  Because that first post was arrant nonsense, people interested in the issues confusedly raised there tried to make sense of them independently.[/quote]
Op is 100% a troll, but they are talking about things that are real issues, which come up for lac grads. Course diversity and access to grad courses is an actual issue for some fields[/quote]

Not really. It can be an issue an engineering if the LAC doesn’t offer, but even there entry into the field is possible if studying the adjacent science.  Some of the very top PhD feeders are the smallest LACs with the fewest courses, like Reed or Haverford. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics