Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Metropolitan DC Local Politics
Reply to "ripple effects from government employment/contracting uncertainty in DMV economy?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]This new EO will complete destroy the economy in the DC metro and the US at large. Requiring that agencies get rid of 4 employees for every 1 employee they hire. This rule basically mandates that government agencies reduce their staff by 8% each year. In combination with mass scale RIFs you are easily looking at a 30-50% decline in the federal workforce. In combination with the proposed budget cuts of 250 billion per year, you are looking at job losses in excess of 3 million people for the US. This does not even consider the spillover effects of employed people cutting back on spending due to lower consumer confidence. It will be an unmitigated economic disaster that is completely self inflicted. [/quote] Curious though how many of the 2MM feds in total are impacted. This EO excludes any agencies dealing with security and immigration…so excludes border agents, ICE, TSA, probably a decent amount of FBI (they may replace agents but doesn’t sound like they will be reduced), assume Himeland is excluded, assume NSA and CIA excluded (again they may replace CIA agents but not sure there will be less). Then you have air traffic control which needs to hire people, USPS (I guess they could reduce this) and then VA hospitals and the people administering VA benefits (VA and benefits is 600,000 federal workers alone). So seems like all of the above are easily 1 MM employees if not more.[/quote] They offered a buyout to the entirety of CIA, so don't assume CIA (or really FBI) is excluded. I wouldn't assume DOD is excluded either, since it can't be.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics