Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Jobs and Careers
Reply to "Patent Office RTO Predictions"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I'm a current Trademark Examiner who has been here since the late 90's. What the former examiner is referring to is our form paragraphs. Yes, there are standard paragraphs that cite the current law. When we refuse a trademark, the grounds are the same for many refusals. There is no use reinventing the wheel. It also keeps us consistent across the examining corps. Having said that, it is false to say we don't draft our own letters or that we don't write our own explanations. We have plenty of autonomy. We were hired and trained to use our judgement. Trademark examination is subtle and I don't think that AI is up to the task yet. [/quote] I've also never worked anywhere as a lawyer that didn't use templates and form paragraphs. You don't rewrite motions and judges don't write new orders from scratch every time that would be a huge waste of time. You tweak your caselaw over time, particularly if a new decision comes down. But of course there's analysis and application of case law to your specific facts.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics