Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Trump wants Ann Selzer punished for her Iowa poll Predicition."
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Maybe Selzer made a last-resort decision to publish this bad data to influence the election outcome. If it had worked, Harris would have won and Selzer could continue being a pollster. It did not work, and now she is done. But she gave it a shot.[/quote] how would this influence the outcome? it was one poll for iowa how exactly do you think polling works?! [/quote] Douglas Mackey got prosecuted for publishing one meme. Mackey had a much smaller audience than Selzer. In any case, the law doesn't hinge on the number of people who see it. [/quote] i think you might not be a lawyer?[/quote] Again with the personal attack due to an inability to present facts and evidence to the contrary. The US Code at issue here has been warped to be applicable to Selzer. [/quote] Np- by you. Not by the DOJ. The things are are comparing aren’t comparable. [/quote] What's the difference between Mackey and Selzer's behavior then with regard to 18 USC 241? [/quote] Did ann tell people to vote using an app on their phone when she polled them? Did she tell them that the election was Thursday November 7 when she polled them? Did ann tell them their polling places had moved when she polled them? No? Ok. Please stop you are embarrassing yourself. [/quote] No, she told them their vote wasn't going to matter because Harris had a big lead. That's a matter of evidence and intent that should be determined at trial. Now, let's say Selzer isn't guilty. The problem is the DOJ ignored misconduct much closer to Mackey's. Specifically, Kristina Wong told "Trump Supporters" to vote by phone on "Super Wednesday." Of course, the corrupt DOJ didn't prosecute her because justice doesn't apply to Dems under Garland. [/quote] Honey. She cold called like 800 Iowans, asked them questions, and reported the results. Stay mad I guess, but she literally didn’t tell them anything. THEY TOLD HER. That’s how polling works. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics