Reply to NYT story: Trump administration could strike abortion almost immediately using Comstock law

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "NYT story: Trump administration could strike abortion almost immediately using Comstock law"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]What I am always perplexed by with my very pro-choice friends is that when they or another friend/acquaintance is pregnant with a wanted child, it’s called a baby from the minute they find out they’re pregnant. But when the pregnancy is not wanted, it’s not a baby, just a clump of cells.[/quote]

Don't play stupid.

I was born to an unwed mother. People like you made it hell for her and for me.

She should have has a real choice... not to go through with the pregnancy, or financial support.

She got neither and was forced to abandon me.

ONLY WANTED BABIES SHOULD BE BORN.

[/quote]

I'm sorry you have been led to believe that you should not have been born.  That is wrong.   Your life matters.  You matter.   I am glad you were born.[/quote]
But you sure as hell wouldn’t vote for any social services to support the unwed mother after she gave birth.  Conservatives care about fetuses; after they’re born not so much.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics