Reply to NYT story: Trump administration could strike abortion almost immediately using Comstock law

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "NYT story: Trump administration could strike abortion almost immediately using Comstock law"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]What I am always perplexed by with my very pro-choice friends is that when they or another friend/acquaintance is pregnant with a wanted child, it’s called a baby from the minute they find out they’re pregnant. But when the pregnancy is not wanted, it’s not a baby, just a clump of cells.[/quote]

This is an interesting point. [/quote]

?? I mean not really interesting to me.

Have you had an abortion? Had any friends who have?

I’ve had not had one myself (I actually have 3 kids and been married 20+ years, JD Vance would love me).  I know of one close friend  who had one an abortion.  People who do have real and legitimate reasons.  My friend has since passed away (cancer).

I’m now old enough that any abortion ban is not going to impact me personally. And my kids are all boys so they are fortunate they wouldn’t be directly impacted.  But none the less: hands off my body!!

There is NO way the govt should have any role in the decisions that women make about their own bodies.

The GOP makes no sense:

Guns = govt cannot control 
Women = it’s a - ok that govt controls their own body

Basically if you are anti choice you are sawing that women are less important than guns.

Crazy.  Weird.  Makes no sense.

[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics