Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
College and University Discussion
Reply to "Was UM, UVA, and UW Madison considered more “prestigious” back in the day?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]At my expensive and high performing private school in the 1990s, Michigan, Madison and UVA were all well-regarded OOS flagships. These three and Berkeley[b] were the only respectable public schools that carried the same oomph as the lower T25 private universities. [/b] Don't recall much interest in UCLA. [/quote] That doesn't seem right. [/quote] NP, it is very much right. Nobody cared about Vanderbilt, Rice, UCLA, USC, Wash U, Northeastern (especially), back then. The top public schools were: Berkeley, Mich, UVA, UNC, and Wisconsin. Some of those ranked higher than some Ivies. HYPS were of course hot back then Other top schools were Georgetown, Hopkins, Chicago. That was about it. Then there were the Smiths, the Williams, etc. And everything else after that. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
