Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Money and Finances
Reply to "Would you retire with a NW of $10m?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I would absolutely retire with a NW of $10m. I can live comfortably at a $300k annual income, which is a conservative withdrawal rate. [/quote] Similar situation with similar aged kids. I wouldn’t. Heath insurance is an issue. [/quote] With $10MM NW, you really don't think a family can just buy health insurance? Why not?[/quote]It adds significantly to the annual budget. [/quote] But not really. Of course, OP indicated they receive health insurance even if they were to retire today. I still don't understand why anyone thinks $20k - $30k per year for health insurance is much of an issue with a $10MM net worth. [/quote] It all comes down to how much do they need to live each year (in the lifestyle they want)? 10MM is great if someone is living on 130K/year. But lets say you live until 90 (typical for my family on both sides). that means another 40 years of living and expenses. Take away $1M for college for the 3 kids (one is only 12, instate might be $50K+/year). Then how much of that NW is in intangible assets like a home or boat or car? Let's say 2M. Now you are down to 7M and you need to generate income from that to live. All while realizing you still have a decade before your kids are really out on their own. If you need $400K to live/year, then you likely will be drawing down the principle. If you need only 200K you can probably find a way to generate income without drawing principle. Just need to do the calculations [/quote] Assuming they have to draw 200K from the 7M principle, they would run out after 35 years. They are in their early 50s, so they would already be 90 or very close by then. And if they can only generate 200K income from the 7M (btw, that's less than 3%), they would be considered the worst investors in the world with a 7M portfolio).[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics