Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
College and University Discussion
Reply to "Shooting below your weight "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous[b]]I love the 50-100 merit aid schools. [/b]They weed out the prestige-or-bust crowd, which lowers the intensity on campus. The merit aid eases the urgency for instant ROI, which creates a little space for kids to explore interests for the sake of curiosity alone. It’s a little easier for kids to access opportunities. The professors are still great, but the vibe is more relaxed. There’s less of a socioeconomic barbell effect. If my kid were gunning for McKinsey I might think twice about eschewing the top schools, but otherwise merit aid seems the way to go. [/quote] Which schools are these? [/quote] I like this perspective. This list might be helpful in determining the 50-100 merit aid schools. You can sort by % receiving merit: https://www.collegetransitions.com/dataverse/merit-aid[/quote] Interesting list! FWIW, my kid received more than the average noted for the schools where they were 75%+ on ACT/SAT scores.[/quote] This list seems reliable. My kids applied to LACs, and looking at specific schools (Wooster, Whitman, Grinnell, Lawrence, Hendrix, Kenyon, Beloit, Skidmore, St. Olaf, Lewis and Clark...), the merit offers was actually very close to what I'm seeing on this list. Sometimes a little more, sometimes a little less, but close. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics