Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Bye-bye Chevron "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]This is a reaction to liberals taking advantage of Chevron to write laws without a vote of Congress, calling it an interpretation of a law to which the courts must provide deference. Previously when they lost at the Supreme Court the EPA bragged it was too late the changes had taken effect and couldn't be reversed. This caused the Supreme Court to throw out the Clean Power Plan with a stay before the case could be heard.[/quote] Chevron came about due to a change by Reaganite Republicans at the EPA to make it easier for polluting factories to make changes to a factory without having to get explicit permission from the EPA. Literally, it was FedSoc lawyers in the Reagan Administration who argued for the Chevron deference. Now? Those same FedSoc lawyers want to undo the standard they helped create. It's absolutely incredible and gob smacking. Chevron has nothing to do with "liberals." It was a creation of Reaganites who wanted to ease regulations on polluters.[/quote] Yes, created by Republicans, I think written by Scalia, but the current situation is from liberals misusing the deference. Take a look at California's AB5, essentially banning gig workers. Democrats tried to pass it as the PRO Act, and it didn't pass with many Democrats opposed. Now Biden and California's Labor Secretary Su are implementing it as a regulation. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics