Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
DC Public and Public Charter Schools
Reply to "New opposition petition to the Maury-Miner boundary proposal from DME"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Y'all, can we just drop the LT discussion? Maury is much closer to Miner than LT is. There is no proposed cluster between LT and Miner. If they wanted to cluster LT with another school, wouldn't JOW be the obvious option? I just don't understand why this is even a discussion. You can oppose the cluster without suggesting nonsensical alternatives that make not logistical sense.[/quote] The cluster makes no logistical sense either. The point of discussing the boundaries is that the DME can achieve some of its racial balancing goals by better boundary changes, which it insisted was not possible. But anyone looking on a map can see that there are ways to draw the boundaries more inclusively. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
