Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Metropolitan DC Local Politics
Reply to "Why is Friendship Heights so empty and lame?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]The stores in friendship heights moved to Bethesda (Williams Sonoma, Anthro, Pottery Barn) or City Center (all the luxury brands). It’s always been an awkward site because the developments were unconnected and it’s relatively unattractive. But when Mazza was in its heyday it was a nice place and a destination. That’s probably 15-20 years ago at this point. [/quote] Aesthetics matter. Especially now when online shopping is so easy. You have to make a place attractive to visit and linger. Expanses of concrete, ugly glass and steel buildings, and a major commuter route running right down the middle of it all is going to make this a heavy lift. Hopefully the development realizes just how bad the situation is rather than just thinking [b]a minor facelift[/b] will fix everything. They need to ask, "where will people want to linger?" and not lie to themselves and investors about that. [/quote] I wouldn't call tearing down an entire shopping mall -- with plans for similarly drastic changes on the other side of the street -- "a minor facelift". [/quote] Yeah, tearing down old ugly buildings and putting up new ugly (and bigger!) buildings on the same commuter road is really just a facelift. What is the draw? Why would someone from outside the neighborhood travel to Friendship Heights? Why would they linger there? Its not on the water, near anything "cool", historic, or in anyway a destination. Friendship Heights being a destination is a historical anomaly, which likely can't continue between online shopping and other parts of the city/region getting their acts together. If the developers don't have a plan for making Friendship Heights top-notch then they should just plan FH to be smaller and more locally oriented. [/quote] People don't need to travel there, because the Maryland portion of FH is the densest CDP in the nation (denser than Manhattan). And the DC portion is going to see a huge uptick in density with the new developments, both in FH and nearby. There's also a little thing called the Metro, which is directly below. We get it, you don't like the neighborhood based on what it was. [b]Cool. Edgy, even.[/b] But maybe you could also wait and see how it turns out instead of suggesting it should just be left for dead. [/quote] Ward 3 residents have seen quite a bit of new "urban vibrancy", "cool" and "edginess" in the past three or four years -- and aren't sure that they quite like the results as crime and disorder have increased substantially.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics