Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Bob Menendez indicted again"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][twitter]https://twitter.com/ChuckRossDC/status/1706332017527341287[/twitter][/quote] His argument is that he’s worried that the United States government will start confiscating cash just just like the totalitarian regime his family fled. Wonderful. And, claiming that he has withdrawn $480,000 from his personal savings will need to be proven by him. This should be fun. I wonder how he will explain away the gold bars or the Mercedes. Neither were mentioned in his pitiful press conference. [/quote] He doesn't have to explain any of that. The burden of proof is on the gov. And they are going to have a very hard to proving he got any of this in exchange for an official act.[/quote] I wouldn't be so sure. First, he made this comment publicly. They can access his bank records to see about that $480,000. That would be a hellovalot of withdrawals. Should be easy to check. Secondly, there are others involved here. And, supposedly their DNA is on the cash. I see a plea deal with one or more of his co-conspirators. [/quote] [b]What does it matter if he made the comment publicly? [/b] The cash probably did come from someone else. Just like the vacations, Rolex, cash, and golf equipment that McDonnell got came from someone else. Problem is that it's no longer illegal for elected officials to take that stuff so long as the quid pro quo isn't too clear or the quo is just setting up meetings or talking to other officials.[/quote] This is now his defense. And, should evidence prove otherwise (the dates of the bills, the DNA on the cash, etc.), it will be very hard for him to alter this defense. I think it was stupid of him to make so many comments during this press conference. But, he has not shown himself to be the smartest tool in the box. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics