Reply to Omnibus Corrupt SCOTUS Thread

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Omnibus Corrupt SCOTUS Thread"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]The guy filled in water feature that leads to other water. his actions, now legal, impact the insects, birds and animals that have depended on those water features.

Eventually, we simply wont have a viable ecosystem.

[/quote]

[quote]The justices unanimously agreed that the couple’s specific wetlands should not be subject to Clean Water Act regulation, and that the court’s prior test, stemming from the 2006 case Rapanos v. United States, should no longer determine the scope of the law. For this reason, Kavanaugh’s opinion and a separate opinion from the court’s liberals, are considered to be concurring opinions.[/quote]

https://www.politico.com/news/2023/05/25/supreme-court-dramatically-shrinks-clean-water-acts-reach-00098781[/quote]

So? I am capable of independent thought. Water that ends up in our public waters needs to be protected and regulated. Why should an individual be allowed to pollute water that ends up harming others?[/quote]

Because he bought the judge. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics