Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Kids With Special Needs and Disabilities
Reply to "Latest CDC number 1 in 36 children diagnosed with autism"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Who is this one lunatic on this thread arguing with a ton of people? They apparently have a really, really vested interest in fighting the mere possibility that inflammation be even mentioned in the same sentence as ASD. Which is really interesting and gets to the whole original point of this thread/new study: As you expand the definition of autism, and the spectrum gets wider, do you create a greater likelihood of non-shared interests and infighting -- resulting in people less likely to have their needs heard and met? Certainly sounds like it, based on just the one really loud voice in this thread. [/quote] I have a vested interest in countering pseudoscience. Autism has been a lightening rod for pseudoscience and quackery since forever. It’s very important to be on the lookout for it. It’s not “infighting.” [/quote] DP. There are numerous articles about how autism research has focused on only a small handful of items (largely because most of the research is funded by just 3 sources) so there’s not really enough research to even say if something is pseudoscience or not. [/quote] Pseudoscience? Harvard would disagree... https://hms.harvard.edu/magazine/pandemic/inflammation-link-autism[/quote] +1. I'm the poster about who was confounded that this one poster thinks the inflammation link is psuedoscience. I thought it was a pretty well acknowledged "potential" path of research, but one that has limitations too. There are a lot of major research organizations, mainstream journals, etc recognizing there is probably work to be done down this route. [/quote] Then you're both idiots who can't read. The article literally says that the scans show LOW levels of the marker/protein that is tied to brain inflammation. [/quote] Read dis: https://www.publichealth.columbia.edu/news/study-identifies-biomarkers-linked-autism-risk https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/news/media/releases/brain_inflammation_a_hallmark_of_autism_large_scale_analysis_shows https://medicalxpress.com/news/2019-10-inflammation-autisman-important-piece-puzzle.amp https://www.nature.com/articles/s41398-021-01766-0[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics