Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
College and University Discussion
Reply to "MD Student Needs Safety Options"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]If you are unhooked, you need to think more carefully about schools between Williams and Dickinson. In particular, you need to think through an ED strategy. If your ED strategy is ED1 and ED2 to Williams, Amherst and Swat, your kid may end up at Dickinson or F&M. There are a lot of great schools in between that you would have a much higher chance of acceptance if you apply ED than you would at the top 5. I would figure out which of these appeal to your kid. Yes, Williams is the gold standard, but there are many schools not far behind... Consider Rhodes and Furman for merit aid.[/quote] OP here. Did you have schools in mind? I thought we had a pretty good selection across the small liberal arts colleges. I will take a look at Rhodes and Furman. I’ll admit I’m not well educated on early decision options. Why would doing early decision to one of the more selective schools mean she was locked into one of the less selective ones? Is that because you think she would be rejected out right at the beginning?[/quote] The best and most likely way to get into a selective liberal arts college is by applying ED1 or ED2. These schools take up to half or more of their classes ED. So RD becomes very difficult with fewer open spots, and you are competing against all the kids who got rejected ED from the most selective LACs as well as Ivy League type rejects. Schools also practice yield management (where they don’t extend offers to qualified students because their computers tell them they are statistically unlikely to matriculate) so outcomes can be flukey. In a sense almost all of the top 30 LACs are kind of reachy although with a 35 and a 4.0 you are in good shape. But I would worry about pinning your hopes on top 5 LACs just because they are so ultra competitive. If you apply ED1 and ED2 to Williams, Amherst etc, you could well get rejected both times and then you’ve lost your shot at schools in the 10-30 range. You only had two such schools listed- Hamilton and Midd I think it was- which are very close to the top themselves. What I would do is look at the US News list top 30/40 and think very carefully through process of elimination which schools may be really good fits. Then visit them etc. You could reach for the stars ED1 if you want but maybe ED2 if that doesn’t work out have something less competitive in mind. Or pass on the super duper competitive ones altogether for ED. I think it’s very likely your daughter would get into many schools ranked below 30 or so RD probably with merit aid. But you want to be more strategic in my opinion about the top 30ish and develop an ED game plan. Also, the Ohio schools are a bit easier to get into for the quality they offer and have great performing arts- I would investigate. [/quote] Adding on to the ED discussion. ED is binding. As others have said, you have to be in the position to either have the 80K per year and not mind paying it for the school or qualify for FA (run net price calculators) and feel comfortable with that number and that you don’t need to compare FA amounts or take a merit option that could save you more. If ED is an option financially, if your child has a clear top choice or has a high target/low reach they may want to apply ED. For example, Amherst has an 6% acceptance rate excluding ED and 24% ED acceptance rate. While your child might get some boost applying ED, you have to assume that 24% includes recruited athletes and legacies (assuming Amherst considers legacy in admissions). My gut is there might be a small boost to ED but your kid will be competing with lots of other unhooked kids with high stats where Swarthmore is their dream school. Looking at Wesleyan for example, the overall acceptance rate excluding ED is 17% while that feels more likely than Swarthmore that still means 83% are waitlisted or rejected. The ED rate however is 55%. If Wesleyan was a top choice or a close second, your child might consider either ED1 to Wesleyan or ED to Swarthmore and if they don’t get in, ED2 to Wesleyan. With your child’s stats/interest I wouldn’t say to ED to Dickinson since that has a 47% acceptance rate and your kid is likely in the top 25% for the applicant pool. As long as your kid isn’t phoning it in for the application or picking a program that is much more selective, I would say this is a low target. This chart that using data from the Common Data Sets is helpful https://www.collegetransitions.com/dataverse/early-vs-regular-decision-admission-rates/ [/quote] I would say ED to Dickinson should be totally out of the question, almost for any student (except a very wealthy and weak one), as it potentially impacts merit aid. For a student with a 35 ACT, it would be absurd. This student is not in the top 25% but probably 5%. The only thing she has to worry about is yield control which can be handled through demonstrated interest. Not all acceptance rates were created equal. The Dickinson pool is going to be drastically less competitive than other schools mentioned.[/quote] I’m not saying OP’s daughter should ED to Dickinson, but ED at Dickinson does not impact merit aid because there’s a merit pre-read. I’m saying Dickinson is a good safety for OP’s daughter because of her high grades and because it is likely a good fit, with international business, an excellent ballet program, and the opportunity to continue with music training and performance. The option of continuing music and dance performance without being a major is unusual. The quality of ballet training by CPYB is world renowned. People outside of the ballet world do not understand what is offered by the partnership between Dickinson and CPYB. Not everyone is solely interested in rankings and ROI. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics