Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
DC Public and Public Charter Schools
Reply to "ludlow-taylor"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][b]Not that I don't understand the frustration that I believe causes you to say this, but using your logic, all the OOB kids should also be kicked out of Deal and Hardy. [/b] I'm not the PP who argued that Hill schools should be for IB families, but since I agree with him/her I'll point out that you're painting with too broad a brush. S/he said "phase out" and that doesn't sound unreasonable. In Chicago in the 90s, Mayor Daley often aruged that IB property taxpayers had the right to feel so comfortable with local schools that MOST would seriously consider sending their children to them. His position on IB rights helped transform dozens of inner city schools. From what I've read and heard about Chicago, it wasn't that "all the OOB" kids were kicked out, it was that IB families came flooding in, improving almost everybody's lot. In NW, the OOB population is mainly comprised of DC taxpayers. On the Hill, a good chuck of ours used to be local, but now reside where rents are cheaper (MD). IB parents have almost no recourse and the pols are remiss in leaving us to our own devices to fight back. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics