Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Fairfax County Public Schools (FCPS)
Reply to "Reading Groups"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]A lot of parents wanted a phonics based LA program. I was ecstatic when I heard that they were going to be doing word studies and focusing on spelling and grammar this year. The method that they were using worked for a small group of kids and left a lot of other kids struggling, not just the kids with dyslexia. DS is a smart, capable kid who has not had any corrections to his spelling or grammar in LA for the first 5 years he was in school. That is ridiculous. He knew how to spell the words correctly, we asked him to spell words for us when we saw papers from school, he wasn't doing it because the Teacher didn't correct it and he didn't care. It only started improving when we started making him redo work at home. At the very least, the way FCPS had been teaching LA was allowing kids to be lazy and that was impacting their writing and reading as they got older. At worst, kids who were slow to read or had LDs struggled for a longer period of time then they needed to. That can cause issues with a kids self esteem and desire to learn. I have no problem at my 5th grader who is ahead in reading and does well with comprehension and the like (high iReady's and Pass Advanced on the 2 SOLs he has taken, not that either of those are great measures) will be a better reader and writer with what they are doing now. Kids who are ahead in reading will still be in a higher reading group and will still be working on reading comprehension. He reads a lot at home and we discuss what he is reading. He is going to be fine. [/quote] [b]What parents don’t understand is that phonics, spelling and grammar work should be combined with comprehension and understanding. [/b] Whatever, you are going to get phonics and spelling, but “content-rich” push is coming from companies that are pushing their curriculum. I Know also that the reason why we don’t have science and social studies is that parents 15 years ago wanted to make sure all kids were reading and doing math, so they lobbied for more reading and math time and science and social studies were cut. Parents get what they ask for eventually, so be careful what you ask for because the education companies and legislature is listening. Because of this public schools will always leave something out for someone. As a previous poster said, “the pendulum has swung” enjoy that you are happy with its direction for the time being.[/quote] That is LITERALLY what those of us who are praising the science of reading are saying. It's just that reading comprehension lady can't comprehend this, LOL!![/quote] “Reading comprehension lady”, aka me, has a masters in teaching and actually taught elementary in FCPS for years. I know what balanced literacy looks like. The fact is kids need both phonics and reading comprehension skills. As kids get older, though, the focus needs to be more on comprehension. What I am seeing at my child’s school right now is not balanced. I am seeing a mad rush to catch up on stuff that should have been done in K-2. My child is now way past that and is at ceiling with phonemic awareness. She doesn’t need to know open and closed syllables now. Other kids might, but she is bored. Her scores on nonfiction and fiction sections of standardized tests indicate she may need work on those areas. Not a disability by any means, but she needs to be practicing comprehension and answering questions about texts. I’m not seeing that at all so far. The fact is teachers are now catering to the lowest readers.[/quote] This is the beginning of October. The school year has barely started. The fact is, the school year will get more interesting soon, for your DD and for you.[/quote] Can you explain why you think phonics work SHOULDN’T be differentiated? [/quote] As a teacher, explain how I can teach phonics differentiated? It is 10-15 minutes of each day. I still need to teach all the other parts of language arts. Differentiating reading (in reading groups) is a better use of everyone’s time.[/quote] Incorporate phonics into reading group work. You can also have leveled centers. If you are using any OG stuff (word lists, vowel intensive etc) during your reading group lesson, have it available during independent time. Kids who are working on long vowel patterns can have long vowel word lists, kids who are on CVC can have those etc. If you take 3 minutes during the opening of your reading group to work on a skill make it a phonics skill and then off to the book. Kids can follow up at their seats with differentiated phonics work based on the skill you taught in reading group. Make each skill a week or so. [/quote] Okay. This might work for lower ES but not upper. We don’t do centers for LA. Phonics needs don’t always match comprehension needs. I think it is easier to teach a word study lesson for 10 mins full class and then do comprehension based reading groups. If you have kids who are still learning to read, then fine a 3 min phonics lesson during small group will work. Again, my 10-15 minutes of word study with my AAP kids is helping their spelling, their knowledge of parts of speech and their reading comprehension. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics